After months of shadow-boxing and speculation, Formula 1 finally got some concrete answers on the lay of the land for its 2026 season.
The lifting of the competitive fog was a pleasant surprise to some and a rude shock for others.
Mercedes had a great weekend, turning pole to victory with George Russell, while defending champions McLaren and Lando Norris toiled far from the podium.
Fox Sports, available on Kayo Sports, is the only place to watch every practice, qualifying session and race in the 2026 FIA Formula One World Championship™ LIVE in 4K. New to Kayo? Join now and get your first month for just $1.
The stories were just as interesting at the back as teams with big objectives struggled to make any impact on the field.
We’re only one race into a long, long season, and this weekend’s Chinese Grand Prix will deliver more lessons still, some of which may contradict the answers from Melbourne.
But with every team finally showing its hand, we can begin to draw some conclusions about the state of play in Formula 1.
PIT TALK PODCAST: The 2026 Formula 1 season is underway, with George Russell leading a Mercedes one-two to victory in Melbourne. But not every driver was thrilled with their first experience of the new rules.
THE BIGGEST WINNER HAD LONG BEEN PREDICTED
There’s no doubt about this one. Mercedes has started the season with a comfortable advantage over the field, at least over a single lap. Though the margin looked smaller in the race — albeit no team was likely to be pushing to the limit on Sunday afternoon given the reliability factor — Mercedes still had no real trouble converting a front-row lockout into a one-two finish.
The relative improvement year on year doesn’t look massive — it was on average only 0.388 seconds off pole last year, suggesting a relative gain of less than 0.4 seconds — but given only one team was within 0.8 seconds of its pole time in Melbourne strongly suggests all the rumours of Mercedes being ahead of the curve were true.
Gap to fastest, 2026 Australian Grand Prix
1. Mercedes: fastest
2. Red Bull Racing: +0.785 seconds
3. Ferrari: +0.809 seconds
4. McLaren: +0.862 seconds
5. Racing Bulls: +1.453 seconds
6. Audi: +1.703 seconds
7. Haas: +1.793 seconds
8. Alpine: +1.983 seconds
9. Williams: +2.423 seconds
10. Aston Martin: +3.451 seconds
11. Cadillac: +4.087 seconds
“There’s so much contentment that I feel in the team at the moment,” Mercedes boss Toto Wolff said on Sunday.
“We still won races and finished second in the championship (last year), but a solid one-two where you feel a season ahead that means you can fight for a world championship — that wasn’t for a long time.
“You’re probably more grateful when you bounce back like this, having known the difficult years. That’s why I’m very happy for everyone.
“Most of all, there’s been a certain degree of contentment that Mercedes is back.”
It’s too early to glibly say it’s Mercedes’s championship to lose, but the German marque is certainly the team to beat.
‘Oscar are you OK?’ Aussie in pure shock | 00:28
THE TOP FOUR IS STILL THE TOP FOUR — BUT NOT AS WE KNOW THEM
Despite the suggestion that such sweeping regulation changes could dramatically shake up the pecking order, the top four teams still emerged from testing in a class of their own.
The gap the midfield has widened considerably too. Whereas last year the average pace difference between Ferrari and Williams in fourth and fifth was just 0.147 seconds, this year the equivalent gap from McLaren to Racing Bulls is out to 0.591 seconds — and it’s 0.841 seconds to Audi further back.
Notwithstanding Mercedes’s healthy advantage, it’s expected to contest the title with Ferrari, Red Bull Racing and McLaren.
Coming into the first race, however, there was the expectation that at most there could be six drivers in the mix, at least at first. Andrea Kimi Antonelli and Isack Hadjar, in their second seasons and with difficult briefs, were implicitly discounted.
While it’s tough to say that either will definitely challenge their teammate after just one round, Australia strong suggested that both will figure in the permutations if given the chance by their machinery.
Antonelli’s weekend was scrappy but clearly very fast. His heavy FP3 crash almost cost him his qualifying participation, and he scrubbed his first Q3 time running off the road, but his final lap was quick enough to force teammate George Russell to find improvements to take pole and set up the front-row lockout.
The Italian teenager had a tough start — he was far from the only one — but his race pace was sufficiently strong that he not just finished second but was gradually gaining on Russell throughout the second stint.
He looked fast late last year, and consistency will be key in 2026, but Antonelli looks like he’s taken a good step.
Hadjar, meanwhile, did exactly what Red Bull Racing wants from its second driver: he picked up the pieces when Max Verstappen couldn’t maximise his performance. Qualifying third and briefly having a shot to lead the race, Hadjar was likely to have finished fifth were it not for his engine failure early on Sunday afternoon.
His weekend performance was the most convincing by a Verstappen teammate in years, and you’d have to think there’s plenty of potential unfulfilled just in him adjusting to his new team.
It’s unlikely we’ll have six, never mind eight, title contenders by the final rounds of the year, but all eight frontrunning drivers could have a role to play in shaping the championship outcome.
Scary near miss at the back of the grid! | 00:42
THE BIGGEST LOSER ISN’T WHO YOU MIGHT THINK
It’s a category with many contenders, but the unlucky winner has to be Williams.
Sure, it hasn’t suffered the status loss of McLaren, and unlike Aston Martin, its car isn’t so rough that its drivers are risking permanent nerve damage just by steering it.
But it’s lost far more in a relative sense than McLaren this year, and Aston Martin can — and is vociferously — able to point to Honda’s unreliable power unit as the root cause of its problems.
Williams, meanwhile, made a big song and dance last year about abandoning development on its 2025 car as early or perhaps even earlier than any other team. Principal James Vowles has worked hard to modernise the long-time struggler to be fighting fit for these new rules, which he believed would be the chance to correct the Williams trajectory towards the front of the field.
Last year’s fifth in the championship, he reckoned, was the new baseline.
Instead the team has taken a massive step backwards.
Gap to fastest, last five rounds of 2025
1. McLaren: +0.054 seconds
2. Red Bull Racing: +0.217 seconds
3. Mercedes: +0.388 seconds
4. Ferrari: +0.577 seconds
5. Williams: +0.725 seconds
6. Racing Bulls: +0.753 seconds
7. Aston Martin: +0.771 seconds
8. Sauber (Audi): +0.811 seconds
9. Haas: +0.828 seconds
10. Alpine: +1.245 seconds
Rumoured multiple failed crash tests during the off-season triggered a weight-intensive redesign of key components, which in turn meant the team didn’t have a car ready for the first of three pre-season tests.
Though it completed many laps in the second and third tests, it was clear the car was nowhere near the level to which the team had aspired.
It’s slowest of midfield teams without excuses — that is, it’s ahead only of newcomer Cadillac and the problematic Aston Martin-Honda tie-up. Over a single lap it was more than half a second off the back of the midfield group it formerly led.
While putting the car on a diet is a straightforward path to pace, it’s not a quick process and has to be juggled inside the cost cap with aerodynamic development — and it’s clear work is needed there too.
The question now is twofold: how fast can Williams recover, and will this year’s problems compound into another rules cycle scrapping for minor points?
Piastri explains where it all went wrong | 01:28
CADILLAC HAD MADE A RESPECTABLE START, BUT NOW THE HARD WORK BEGINS
Cadillac’s admirable start to the season ended with Sergio Pérez finishing the race three laps down and Valtteri Bottas retiring with a technical problem.
It’s par for the course for a brand-new team — the challenge of joining Formula 1 isn’t to be underestimated.
“We’ve seen again, it’s not easy,” team principal Graeme Lowdon insisted. “There were a few people who didn’t even take the start. So really satisfied that we got one car home. Obviously, we need to work on pace, that’s a given thing with a new team.”
But the plaudits for doing a good job setting up the team end now. While no-one is expecting Cadillac to end the year as a regular points contender, the trajectory of improvement must be strong.
“The honeymoon is over,” Pérez said. “Now we need to do big steps forward, we need to put a plan on the team to move along and close the gap, which I believe we can do.
“Obviously we are all very competitive inside the team, and that’s the attitude we need from now on, to be able to close the gap and aim for something big this year.”
It’s a task that’ll be made harder as Aston Martin gets its act together.
Cadillac has had the unexpected company of big-spending Aston Martin during pre-season testing and for much of the opening weekend, but Fernando Alonso proved in qualifying that there’s at least some performance to be unlocked from his troubled machine when it can be kept running for long enough.
Honda will fix its reliability problems, and soon the team will be able to finish races and qualify consistently. Even if the Honda motor turns out to be seriously down on power, as the team hinted, the car looks good enough to keep it off the bottom of the pecking order.
Cadillac, sooner or later this year, will be left alone at the back — and again, while there are no expectations to the contrary, being the lonely last-placed team will mean there’s nowhere for the American-owned team to hide on its journey to establishment.
Merc Dominate as Ferrari call backfires | 02:25
THE GAPS ARE MUCH BIGGER THIS YEAR
Some may have taken for granted how competitive Formula 1 had become by the end of last season, the final of four years of the ground-effect rules cycle.
Across the final five rounds of 2025, just 1.245 seconds covered all 10 teams in single-lap pace. That dropped to just 0.828 seconds if you ignore Alpine, which was a distant last almost all year.
There are a couple of different ways to dissect this year’s order, but no matter which way you cut it, the conclusion is always that the gaps between teams are far, far larger this year.
The top nine at the end of last season — down to Haas, which was on average 0.828 seconds off pole — could have fit inside the top four this season. McLaren, the fourth fastest team in Melbourne, was 0.862 seconds off the pace.
Last year’s Alpine would have been comfortably just outside the top four.
The total field spread in Melbourne was 4.087 seconds back to Cadillac, but even if we were to excuse F1’s newcomer and also the struggling Aston Martin, the spread down to ninth is still a massive 2.423 seconds.
Only six cars finished Sunday’s race on the lead lap. Three were lapped twice or more.
This, however, is normal for a regulation change, especially when it comes to one involving the engine.
The last engine rules change was in 2014, and the gaps that year were similarly massive.
Field spread, 2014 season
1. Mercedes: +0.012 seconds
2. Williams: +0.818 seconds
3. Red Bull Racing: +0.964 seconds
4. Ferrari: +1.184 seconds
5. McLaren: +1.354 seconds
6. Toro Rosso: +1.837 seconds
7. Force India: +1.949 seconds
8. Sauber: +2.499 seconds
9. Lotus: +2.577 seconds
10. Caterham: +4.471 seconds
11. Marussia: +4.571 seconds
The previous season, 2013, had see the top four spread over just 0.704 seconds, not dramatically different to the competitive picture at the end of 2025.
We know it took years for a team to challenge Mercedes, and it took several chassis regulation changes to begin to close the field.
But there is one key reason what we’re seeing this year could end differently to the 2014 changes.
Mercedes Top 2 – Russell wins AUS GP | 00:51
WORKS STATUS IS CRUCIAL
You’ll note that in 2014 it was the Williams team that ended as Mercedes’s closest challenger in terms of pure pace. The long-time independent team benefited massively from having a customer Mercedes power unit, which propelled it up the order.
The same thing isn’t happening this year.
McLaren, for example, is a Mercedes customer, but rather than finding itself new the top of the order, it emerged in Melbourne as the slowest car of the frontrunning four.
Ahead of it is the Mercedes works team, the Ferrari works team and the Red Bull Racing works team.
For further evidence, consider even that Audi, the former Sauber squad, is near the head of the midfield this year with its in-house engine, even if its first-time power unit isn’t rated among the best in the field.
Audi was only fractionally behind Racing Bulls, but it’s safe to assume the Red Bull-owned team is enjoying a more open flow of information on how to get the most from the power unit than customers of other brands.
The almost 50-50 split between electrical and combustion power has made configuring the engine so much more complicated than in years past. By regulation all hardware and software must be identical, but you get the most out of it remains up to the teams — though Mercedes customers have been left disappointed by what they appear to feel is an information shortfall from their supplier.
That knowledge gap will close with time — though how much time it takes is unclear. Will it be fast enough for, say, McLaren to compete for the championship, or will works status decide the 2026 title fight?
It’s one of many questions still unanswered after the first race of the season.